Every grievance filed against this reference, with the official GRC decision and the time it took to redress.
General Manager
Department: General Manager Finance (COORD) WAPDA
Email: gm.mandswapda@gmail.com
Chief Engineer
Department: Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) / Member (Water)
Email: zainwapda@gmail.com
Director
Department: General Manager Finance (COORD) WAPDA
Email: dir.legal@wapda.gov.pk
Deputy General Manager
Department: General Manager Finance (Power) WAPDA
Email: nahid_pak@hotmail.com
Director
Department: General Manager Finance (COORD) WAPDA
Email: engineerrusman2010@gmail.com
No grievances have been raised for this procurement.
Chief Engineer
Department: Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) / Member (Water)
Email: pdalhpp@gmail.com
Executive Engineer
Department: Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) / Member (Water)
Email: xenalhpp@gmail.com
Project Manager
Department: Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) / Member (Water)
Email: hasnain_waqar@hotmail.com
REFERENCE: Sub-Clause 1.13.23.3; Price Schedule No. 01; Particular Condition Sub-Clause 14.1(b)
Respected Sir,
CDigital requests the Employer's written confirmation on the following two matters, so that all Proposers price on a common and documented basis.
A. Factory Acceptance Tests
A.1 Is the figure of approximately forty (40) FAT and inspection visits, stated in the reply to Clarification SP-19, the number Proposers are to allow for in the price, or are Proposers to derive the number from their own manufacturing programme?
A.2 Are Factory Acceptance Tests mandatory only for the major plant equipment listed at Sub-Clause 1.13.23.3, or is a wider list of equipment required? If wider, kindly provide the list.
A.3 Is the duration to be taken as seven (07) days per trip under Sub-Clause 1.13.23.3, or up to ten (10) days per visit under the reply to SP-19, the two provisions differing?
A.4 Kindly confirm three (03) witnessing representatives per visit, and the class of air travel and standard of accommodation to be allowed.
B. Custom duties and indirect taxes
B.1 Kindly confirm that prices for imported plant are to be quoted on the CIP basis, with custom duty and sales tax excluded from the activity prices and declared separately in the Custom Duty (PKR) column of Price Schedule No. 01.
B.2 Kindly confirm that custom duty, sales tax, VAT and similar levies actually paid by the Contractor are reimbursed by the Employer under Particular Condition Sub-Clause 14.1(b), against invoices showing such taxes as a separate line item with proof of payment.
B.3 Are any of these duties or taxes instead exempted for this Project? If so, kindly advise which, and the procedure to be followed.
B.4 Kindly confirm the mechanism of reimbursement, that is whether through the Specified Provisional Sums or the interim payment certificates, and the basis on which Proposers are to populate the Custom Duty column at Proposal stage.
Submitted for your kind consideration and favourable response, please.
Yours faithfully,
CDigital
Please find enclosed the reply of pre-bid clarification
View Response PDF Responded on: Aug 20, 2026, 02:24 PMDear Sir,
We respectfully submit that the recent changes/amendments in bidding documents have necessitated further review and corresponding updates to our Technical and Financial Proposals. This has also required fresh confirmations from manufacturers, suppliers, and specialist subcontractors regarding technical particulars, delivery schedules, quotations, and price validity. The required confirmations and commercial inputs are taking additional time due to ongoing technical and commercial coordination with the concerned parties, while prevailing market and logistics conditions are also affecting the finalization of prices and delivery commitments.
In view of the above, we respectfully request the Employer to grant a further extension of one (1) month to the Bid Submission Deadline. The requested extension will enable us to incorporate the updated requirements and submit a complete, competitive, and fully responsive Bid.
Thanking you and assuring you of our best services.
Sincerely,
For and on behalf of Ghulam Rasool & Company Pvt Ltd
Engr. Muhammad Shoaib Ilahi
GM Business Operations
Please find enclosed the reply of pre-bid clarification
View Response PDF Responded on: Aug 12, 2026, 01:25 AMRespected Sir,
1. CDigital gratefully acknowledges the Employer’s extension of the Proposal submission deadline to 20 August 2026. This extension has been of material assistance, and the Technical and Financial Proposals are presently at an advanced stage of preparation.
2. The changes introduced through Addendum No. 03 require corresponding confirmations to be obtained afresh from the equipment manufacturers and sub-suppliers, including revised technical particulars, performance guarantees, type-test and model-test references, delivery schedules and price validities. These confirmations involve sequential engineering and commercial reviews at the manufacturers’ works and, despite continuous follow-up by the Consortium, cannot be completed responsibly within the time now available.
3. In addition, the ongoing armed conflict between the United States and Iran has severely disrupted shipping, insurance and logistics worldwide. Re-routing of vessels, elevated war-risk premiums, port congestion and constrained banking and communication channels have delayed the responses of manufacturers and suppliers in respect of freight, delivery schedules and price confirmations. These circumstances are entirely beyond the control of the Proposers.
4. In view of the foregoing, it is respectfully requested that the Proposal submission deadline be further extended by a period of two (2) months beyond 20 August 2026, that is, up to 20 October 2026, with corresponding adjustment of the Proposal validity and Proposal security periods.
5. The extension requested is of general application and would enable all Proposers to submit complete, competitive and fully responsive Proposals, to the ultimate benefit of the Project and of the evaluation process.
Submitted for your kind consideration and favourable action, please.
Yours faithfully,
CDigital Pakistan
Please find enclosed the reply of pre-bid clarification
View Response PDF Responded on: Aug 12, 2026, 01:23 AMReference: Volume-II, Employer's Requirements, Sub-Clause 1.1.15 (Efficiency) and Table 8-6: "Guaranteed Turbine Weighted Average Efficiency shall be greater than 92.8%."
Dear Sir,
The guaranteed turbine weighted average efficiency is governed by the weighting factors specified in Sub-Clause 1.1.15 (59 / 20 / 12 / 9 at 100 / 80 / 60 / 40% turbine power), which place substantial weight on the part-load points (60% and 40%), where Francis turbine efficiency inherently declines. The resulting weighted average is therefore highly sensitive to the reference runner design and to the net head at which the load points are evaluated.
To enable all Proposers to guarantee on a common and demonstrable basis, we request the Employer to clarify:
Whether the >92.8% requirement is derived strictly by applying the Sub-Clause 1.1.15 weighting factors (59/20/12/9) to the four load points, and at what reference net head / reservoir condition these points are defined.
The specific reference runner, model designation and manufacturer, and the model/prototype test from which the 92.8% weighted average value was obtained, so that all Proposers may benchmark against a demonstrated, achievable figure.
Best Regards,
CDigital Pakistan
Please find enclosed the reply of pre-bid clarification
View Response PDF Responded on: Jul 21, 2026, 03:57 PMThe Past Experience required can be met by a Specialized Sub Contractor for qualification?
Submitted on: Jul 15, 2026, 03:11 AM
Please find enclosed the reply of pre-bid clarification
View Response PDF Responded on: Jul 21, 2026, 10:57 AMIt is found that Sole propreitership firms are not allowed to Bid, requested to relax this restriction please.
Submitted on: Jul 15, 2026, 03:23 AM
Please find enclosed the reply of pre-bid clarification
View Response PDF Responded on: Jul 21, 2026, 10:52 AMDear Sir,
Under Volume-II, Part-II, Technical Provisions, Sub-Clause 3.5.1, the Generator Circuit Breakers (GCBs) are specified as vacuum type. However, Addendum No. 01 requires the 11 kV switchgear for the generating units to be of SF₆ type, while all other 11 kV switchgear remains specified as vacuum type.
We respectfully request the Employer to confirm that vacuum-type Generator Circuit Breakers, as originally specified under Sub-Clause 3.5.1, shall remain acceptable, provided they comply with all specified ratings and technical requirements.
Generator Circuit Breakers are specially designed to interrupt generator fault currents, system faults, synchronization switching, and other generator operating duties. Vacuum Generator Circuit Breakers are widely used and proven for these applications at the 11 kV level and fully satisfy the required performance and interrupting capabilities.
We also note that the Schedules of Technical Particulars continue to specify “Arc Quenching Medium (Vacuum)/SF₆ Breakers” for the Generator Circuit Breakers, indicating that both technologies are acceptable.
Using vacuum technology for the Generator Circuit Breakers also provides the benefit of maintaining common equipment with the remaining 11 kV switchgear, simplifying operation, maintenance, and spare parts management. In addition, vacuum circuit breakers require no gas handling or gas density monitoring and offer high reliability and long service life.
In view of the above, we kindly request the Employer to confirm that vacuum-type Generator Circuit Breakers are acceptable for the 11 kV Generator Switchgear, provided they meet all requirements of the Bidding Documents.
Your clarification will be appreciated to enable bidders to prepare technically compliant and competitive proposals.
Yours truly,
CDigital
Please find enclosed the reply of pre-bid clarification
View Response PDF Responded on: Jul 14, 2026, 11:51 AMRespected Chief Engineer / PD ALHPP,
With reference to Project Package-III: Electro-Mechanical Works of Attabad Lake Hydropower Project (54 MW), please find attached additional pre-bid clarification questions for your reference.
Thank you for your attention.
Best regards,
CDigital
View PDF Submitted on: Jun 17, 2026, 05:12 PM
Please find enclosed the reply of pre-bid clarification
View Response PDF Responded on: Jun 24, 2026, 01:16 PMDear Sir,
We are extremely pleased to participate in the bidding process for the subject project. In order to comprehensively analyze all aspects of the bidding documents, proposal requirements, and other relevant factors, we would like to request your good office to kindly extend the bid submission date by two months.
View PDF Submitted on: Jun 04, 2026, 12:03 PM
Please find enclosed the reply of pre-bid clarification
View Response PDF Responded on: Jun 10, 2026, 02:31 AMDear Sir,
M/s Shaheen & Sons intends to participate in the bidding process for the 54 MW Attabad Hydropower Project, Package-III (Electro-Mechanical Works).
Due to the detailed and comprehensive nature of the bidding requirements, extensive coordination with foreign manufacturers and suppliers is required for the preparation of a responsive and competitive bid. Furthermore, the ongoing election activities in Gilgit-Baltistan have also affected the timely completion of the necessary documentation and consultations.
In view of the above, we respectfully request that the bid submission deadline may kindly be extended by four (04) weeks to enable prospective bidders to complete all technical and commercial requirements and submit competitive proposals.
Your favorable consideration of this request will be highly appreciated.
Thanking you.
Yours faithfully,
Iftikhar Ahmed
Cell +92 314 3454444
Submitted on: Jun 04, 2026, 08:04 PM
Please find enclosed the reply of pre-bid clarification
View Response PDF Responded on: Jun 10, 2026, 02:29 AMDear Sir,
Attached please find our letter no. AFI/ALHPP/BID/06/26 dated 02-06-2026 for your consideration and early response.
Regards,
AL-FAJR International
View PDF Submitted on: Jun 02, 2026, 05:12 PM
Please find enclosed the reply of pre-bid clarification
View Response PDF Responded on: Jun 08, 2026, 10:55 PMDear Sir,
We are extremely pleased to participate in the Bidding for the subject project. During our review of the Bidding Documents, certain points require clarification for better understanding and proper preparation of our Proposal. In this regard, we would like to request you to please provide clarification on the queries attached herewith for your kind review and response.
View PDF Submitted on: Jun 02, 2026, 12:50 PM
Please find enclosed the reply of pre-bid clarification
View Response PDF Responded on: Jun 08, 2026, 10:54 PMDear Sir,
We respectfully refer to the bidding process for the 54 MW Attabad Hydropower Project and would like to request a second extension of the bid submission deadline (16-June-2026) for a minimum period of eight (08) weeks.
As you are aware, the successful preparation of a competitive and technically sound bid requires extensive coordination with international manufacturers and suppliers for major electromechanical and associated equipment. Despite our continuous efforts and follow-ups, we have received a relatively limited response from several foreign manufacturers.
The primary reasons communicated by these manufacturers include:
1- Concerns regarding the prevailing conditions in the power sector, which have affected their willingness to participate in new projects in the region.
2- Financial and commercial uncertainties that have resulted in extended internal review and approval processes by potential suppliers.
3- Security-related concerns associated with the region, leading some manufacturers to undertake additional risk assessments before committing to quotations and technical proposals.
These factors have significantly affected the timely receipt of firm quotations and technical inputs necessary for the preparation of a comprehensive and competitive bid.
In view of the above circumstances, we kindly request the Employer to grant a second extension of at least eight (08) weeks for the bid submission date. This additional time will enable bidders to secure meaningful participation from reputable international manufacturers and submit more competitive and technically optimized proposals, ultimately benefiting the project and the Employer.
We shall be grateful for your favorable consideration of this request and look forward to your positive response.
Kind Regards,
Authorized Representative
Umer Jan & CO JV
Submitted on: Jun 03, 2026, 03:14 PM
Please find enclosed the reply of pre-bid clarification
View Response PDF Responded on: Jun 08, 2026, 10:51 PMDear Sir,
This is with reference to the Invitation to Bid / Proposal for the subject cited project. We have initially gone through the bidding documents and request the Employer for the following:
One Contract of Hydropower Projects of 45 MW or higher and should be in successful commercial operation for one year
Or
Two (02) separate Contracts of Hydropower Project totaling 45 MW or higher and at-least one should be in successful commercial operation for one year.
………………………..
Keeping in view the true spirit of EPC contract, we hereby request the Employer to modify the said criteria as follows:
One Contract of Hydropower Projects of 45 MW or higher and should be in successful commercial operation for one year
Or
Three (03) separate Contracts of Hydropower Project totaling 45 MW or higher and with one of the contracts must be at least 35 MW and at-least one should be in successful commercial operation for one year.
……………………….
Furthermore, due to Eid-Al-Azha holidays in the next week and other unforeseen circumstances, we are finding it challenging to meet the current deadline and in dire need of extension in bid submission date. We believe that an extension will allow us to submit a more comprehensive and competitive proposal that aligns with your project requirements. Therefore, the Employer is requested to kindly extend the date for submission for one month and oblige
Thanking and assuring you of our best services and cooperation.
View PDF Submitted on: May 18, 2026, 05:32 PM
Please find enclosed the reply of pre-bid clarification
View Response PDF Responded on: May 25, 2026, 11:01 AMThe Project Director
54 MW Attabad Hydropower Project
WAPDA
Dear Sir,
With due respect, it is submitted that your office advertised the bidding for Electrical and Mechanical (E&M) Works of the 54 MW Attabad Hydropower Project. We have noted that the bid submission date has been extended; however, no addendum or corrigendum in this regard has been found on the EPADS application or any other available source.
In this connection, it is kindly requested to clarify the following points:
Whether bidders are required to obtain manually issued bidding documents from the office of the Project Director, or if the soft copy downloaded from the EPADS application shall be considered sufficient for participation in the bidding process.
Since no updated notice regarding the revised addendum is currently available on the EPADS application, it is requested that the complete bidding procedure and updated schedule and all addendum may kindly be communicated.
Your early response in this regard will be highly appreciated so that all necessary arrangements may be made in accordance with the bidding requirements.
Submitted on: May 18, 2026, 11:48 PM
it is intimated that the addendum no, 01 has been uploaded on EPADs v2.0 as part of bidding document. pkease download the bidding documents to access the addendum. Detail reply of the pre-bid clarfication is enclosed herewith for your information.
View Response PDF Responded on: May 25, 2026, 11:00 AM
jhljkn
Submitted on: May 18, 2026, 11:42 PM
The submitted pre-bid clarification request is unclear/incomplete. The bidder is requested to resubmit the clarification with complete and specific details for appropriate response
Responded on: May 20, 2026, 09:00 AMRespected Chief Engineer / PD ALHPP,
With reference to Project Package-III: Electro-Mechanical Works of Attabad Lake Hydropower Project (54 MW), ARFP No.: BD/ICB-ALHPP-03, please find attached additional pre-bid clarification questions for your reference.
Thank you for your attention.
Best regards,
CDigital
View PDF Submitted on: May 13, 2026, 03:21 PM
The Replies of additional Pre-bid Clarificaiton are enclosed herewith for your information, please.
Chief Engineer/PD
Attabad Lake HPP
WAPDA, Hunza
View Response PDF Responded on: May 18, 2026, 11:45 AMDear Sir,
We AL-FAJR International together with our JV partner, are interested to participate in E&M Package-III of Attabad HPP. We also attended the pre-bid meeting online via zoom link. You are requested to kindly share the Minutes of the pre-bid meeting along with the responses of the clarifications sought by the prospective bidders. Our e.mail address is afi@alfajr.com.pk
Regards,
NABEEL TAHIR
Submitted on: Apr 30, 2026, 02:03 PM
Minutes of Pre-bid meeting held on April 14, 2026 are enclosed herewith as desired, please
View Response PDF Responded on: Apr 30, 2026, 05:58 PMDear Sir,
With reference to the bidding documents (RFP No.: BD/ICB-ALHPP-03) issued for the Attabad Hydropower Project, we would like to seek clarification and request reconsideration of certain payment provisions stipulated under Sub-Clause 14.4 (Schedule of Payments) of SECTION VIII PARTICULAR CONDITIONS (Part B - Special Provisions).
It has been noted that the bidding documents provide for a deduction of 2.5% from each payment under the payment schedule, to be released upon issuance of the Defects Notification Certificate (DNC). We further observe that this provision has also been applied to the design payment schedule.
In this regard, we respectfully submit that, as per established engineering practice and standard contract frameworks, design services are typically paid in full upon approval by the Engineer / Employer, as they are not subject to post-construction defects in the same manner as physical works. The withholding of a portion of design payments until the Defects Notification stage does not align with standard industry practices and may adversely impact the design development process.
Furthermore, the bidding documents also stipulate a 5% retention deduction from each payment. We would like to highlight that, under standard FIDIC conditions, retention money is primarily associated with construction (civil) works to ensure performance and remedy of defects during the Defects Notification Period.
Given that the present scope predominantly relates to Electro-Mechanical (E&M) works and design, the application of retention in the same manner as civil works requires clarification. Typically, for E&M works, performance securities, warranties, and defect liability obligations adequately cover the Employer’s risk without necessitating substantial retention deductions.
In view of the above, we kindly request the Employer to:
We shall appreciate your clarification on the above matters at the earliest, to enable us to proceed with a clear understanding of the commercial framework.
Thanking you and looking forward to your response.
Regards,
Authorized Representative
Umer Jan & CO JV
Reply of pre-proposlal clarification is enclosed herewith
View Response PDF Responded on: Apr 30, 2026, 01:08 PMRespected Sir,
CDigital respectfully requests a one (01) month extension of the bid submission deadline currently notified on EPADS V2.0 for Package-III (Electro-Mechanical Works) of the Attabad Lake Hydropower Project (54 MW).
The principal ground for this request is the pending issuance of Addendum No. 01 to the RFP/EPC Bidding Document, which AHMC have confirmed will be uploaded on EPADS V2.0 “in due course”. The Addendum carries material changes to the Scope of Works and the technical specifications (ref. AHMC Replies to Items 01, 04, 05 and 06 of the Pre-Proposal Clarifications), and the priced proposal cannot be finalized until it is issued.
Additional time is also required after issuance of the Addendum to incorporate the revised scope into the bid and obtain updated quotations from OEMs. The requested extension is therefore driven by the Employer’s own pending Addendum and will allow all bidders an equal opportunity to submit fully responsive proposals on the post-Addendum scope.
It is accordingly requested that (a) the bid submission deadline be extended by one (01) month, (b) the bid validity and bid security validity be correspondingly adjusted, and (c) the revised deadline be notified on EPADS V2.0 in the usual manner.
Your kind and favourable consideration at the earliest will be highly appreciated.
Yours sincerely,
CDigital Pakistan
2nd Floor Platino Mall, D-Block Markaz, Gulberg Greens, Islamabad
Submitted on: Apr 28, 2026, 04:13 PM
please find enclosed herewithr replies of pre-bid clarification.
View Response PDF Responded on: Apr 30, 2026, 12:59 PMDear Sir,
Regards,
Authorized Representative
Umer Jan & CO JV
Reply of Pre-bid Clarification is enclosed
View Response PDF Responded on: Apr 29, 2026, 01:25 PMDear Sir,
We are extremely pleased to participate in the Bidding for the subject project. In order to analyze comprehensively all aspects of the bidding documents, Proposal and various other factors, we would like to request you to please extend the Submission date for six weeks.
We believe that a six-week extension shall facilitate us to work more vigilantly on this esteemed project.
Thanking you and assuring you of our best services,
Sincerely,
For and on behalf of Ghulam Rasool & Company Pvt Ltd
Engr. Muhammad Shoaib Ilahi
GM Business Operations
Submitted on: Apr 28, 2026, 12:20 PM
Replt of Post Proposal Clarification is enclosed
View Response PDF Responded on: Apr 29, 2026, 01:23 PMRespected Chief Engineer / PD ALHPP,
With reference to Project Package-III: Electro-Mechanical Works of Attabad Lake Hydropower Project (54 MW), ARFP No.: BD/ICB-ALHPP-03, please find attached the pre-bid clarification questions for your reference.
Thank you for your attention.
Best regards,
View PDF Submitted on: Apr 13, 2026, 03:26 PM
Replies / clarifications to the submitted queries are furnished herewith for information and further neccessary action, please.
View Response PDF Responded on: Apr 28, 2026, 03:14 PMRespected Chief Engineer / PD ALHPP,
With reference to Project Package-III: Electro-Mechanical Works of Attabad Lake Hydropower Project (54 MW), ARFP No.: BD/ICB-ALHPP-03, please find attached the pre-bid clarification questions for your reference.
Thank you for your attention.
Best regards,
View PDF Submitted on: Apr 17, 2026, 10:59 AM
Replies / clarifications to the submitted queries are hereby furnished herewith for information and necessary further action, please.
View Response PDF Responded on: Apr 27, 2026, 12:06 PMRespected Chief Engineer / PD ALHPP,
With reference to Project Package-III: Electro-Mechanical Works of Attabad Lake Hydropower Project (54 MW), ARFP No.: BD/ICB-ALHPP-03, please find attached the pre-bid clarification questions for your reference.
Thank you for your attention.
Best regards,
View PDF Submitted on: Apr 17, 2026, 10:59 AM
Replies / clarifications to the submitted queries are hereby furnished herewith for information and further neccessary action, please.
View Response PDF Responded on: Apr 27, 2026, 12:05 PMRespected Chief Engineer / PD ALHPP,
With reference to Project Package-III: Electro-Mechanical Works of Attabad Lake Hydropower Project (54 MW), ARFP No.: BD/ICB-ALHPP-03, please find attached the pre-bid clarification questions for your reference.
Thank you for your attention.
Best regards,
View PDF Submitted on: Apr 17, 2026, 02:25 PM
Pre-bid clarification queries submitted by prospective proposers for Project Package-III: Electro-Mechanical Works of Attabad Lake Hydropower Project (54 MW), ARFP No. BD/ICB-ALHPP-03 have been examined in light of the bidding documents.
Replies / clarifications to the submitted queries are hereby furnished herewith for information and necessary further action, please
View Response PDF Responded on: Apr 27, 2026, 12:01 PMA Pre-Proposal meeting with Potential Proposers (having expertise in Hydropower Sector) was arranged, in accordance with the provisions of the RFP/EPC Bidding Document of Package-III, on April 14, 2026, at 1100 hrs. in the WAPDA Authority's Room, 729, WAPDA House, Lahore. A number of potential Proposers who had downloaded the RFP/EPC Bidding Document of Package-III: Electro-Mechanical Works from EPADS V2.0 attended the meeting via zoom link / physical presence. The meeting was chaired by General Manager (Projects) Northern Areas, WAPDA and the list of participants is attached as Annex-I.
The purpose of the meeting was to provide a clear understanding of the project requirements, scope of work, and expectations prior to submission of proposals. The forum enabled clarification of technical, administrative, and contractual aspects of the package, as well as addressing queries and concerns of the participants.
The meeting aimed to:
• Reduce ambiguities in the bidding documents,
• Improve the quality of proposals, and
• Ensure a fair and transparent procurement process.
The Chief Engineer/ Project Director, Attabad Lake Hydropower Project (ALHPP), WAPDA, gave a detailed presentation on the project
The Chief Engineer/PD informed that WAPDA is the Executing Agency of Project on behalf of Government of Gilgit Baltistan (GB). The initial feasibility study, carried out by GoGB, estimated the project capacity at 32.5 MW, which was later enhanced to 54 MW by WAPDA after further studies.
He further apprised that:
• The PC-I, amounting to PKR 21,246 million, was approved by ECNEC in August 2021, and its revision is currently under process.
• The project site is located approximately 120 km from Gilgit and 750 km from Islamabad.
Chief Engineer/PD briefed in detail about other aspects such as salient features, project consultants and updated progress of the Project and further apprised that the Project has been divided into the following packages:
• Package-I: Civil and Auxiliary Works
• Package-II: 132 kV Transmission Line Works
• Package-III: Electro-Mechanical Works
• Package-IV: Overflow Weir & Landslide Slope Treatment Works
It was further intimated to the participants that Package-I: Civil and Auxiliary Services is at award stage,
The Project Manager, AHMC, stated that the purpose of the session was to address queries and concerns raised by proposers regarding the RFP/EPC Bidding Documents uploaded on EPADS V2.0.
He emphasized that the forum was intended to facilitate better understanding of the bidding requirements and contractual provisions.
It was further clarified that:
• All queries shall be submitted through EPADS V2.0 (mandatory).
• Responses to pre-proposal queries will be issued formally through EPAD V 2.0 to all prospective proposers, in accordance with prescribed procurement procedures
|
Sr. No. |
Discussions |
|
|
|
Potential Proposer’s Queries |
Project Authorities Responses |
|
1. |
The Representative of Proposer M/s CDigital stated that they had already submitted the detailed technical queries regarding the uploaded RFP/EPC Bidding Document of Package‑III. They further inquired about the next course of action and whether a site visit for Proposers can be planned, noting that only one month remains until the proposal submission deadline of May 14, 2026, which they considered a short timeframe. |
The Project Manager AHMC acknowledged receipt of the Pre-Proposal Clarifications submitted by Proposer M/s CDigital on April 13, 2026. He assured that the formally submitted queries will be responded at the earliest possible time. Site Visit shall be facilitated by the Project office/ Consultant upon formal request from the proposer. |
|
2. |
The Representative of Proposer M/s CDigital raised concerns regarding the right-side landslide slope treatment under Package-IV, specifically highlighting the overlap of certain works between Civil Works and Electro-Mechanical Works, and the need for clear demarcation and coordination of responsibilities. |
The Project Director, ALHPP WAPDA, addressed the query by clarifying that the Civil Works are included under EPC Contractor Scope of Work of Package-I (Civil & Auxiliary Services Works), whereas the right bank landslide slope treatment is to be carried out by Contractor of Package-IV (Civil Works for Overflow Weir Structure & Landslide Slope Treatment) which is under Admeasurement Contract mode. He further apprised the Proposers that Package-I is at an advanced stage of EPC Contract award, while construction activities under Package-IV are expected to commence following completion of diversion works, anticipated within approximately 2–3 years from the commencement date of Package-I. He emphasized that adequate time is available for execution of Package-IV and confirmed that there is no interface or overlap of Package-IV with the scope of Package-III: Electro-Mechanical Works |
|
3. |
A query was raised by the representative of Proposer M/s CDigital regarding the Civil works associated with the 132 kV Switchyard of ALHPP. It was noted that while the RFP/EPC Bidding Document clearly define the scope of Electro-Mechanical Works for 132 kV Switchyard, ambiguity remains regarding the responsibility for execution of the associated Civil Works for 132 kV Switchyard, for which clarification was sought. Furthermore, the representative of the Proposer M/s CDigital requested that the queries formally submitted to the Employer with respect to the RFP/EPC Bidding Document of Package-III be duly addressed and responded to. |
The Project Manager, AHMC, addressed the query by clarifying that the Civil Works for the 132-kV switchyard has been included within the scope of Package-I (Civil & Auxiliary Services Works) and shall be executed by the respective EPC Contractor in coordination with Package-III EPC Contractor. He further added that responses to the Pre-Proposal Clarification raised by the Proposer M/s CDigital will be provided in due course of time. |
|
4. |
While citing the Synchronous Generator efficiency requirement of 98% as stipulated in the RFP/EPC Bidding Documents of Package-III, the representative of Proposer M/s Shaheen & Sons stated that Chinese Manufacturers are generally offering Synchronous Generator efficiencies in the range of 96–97% and they requested consideration of some flexibility or relaxation in the specified efficiency requirement of Synchronous Generator for ALHPP. |
The Senior Electrical Engineer, AHMC, responded that a Synchronous Generator efficiency level of 96–97% has been considered relatively low for the proposed rating of 23.2 MVA Generator for Hydropower Project and further elaborated that the Vertical Francis Turbine efficiency, already in the range of 93%, would be difficult to enhance significantly beyond the stated level. The Project Manager, AHMC, added that the overall hydropower generation output remains the key consideration, and the relevant performance parameters must be reviewed to ensure that any reduction in Synchronous Generator efficiency does not adversely affect the required design generation output. He further noted that a lower Synchronous Generator efficiency may be considered acceptable, subject to confirmation that the overall plant performance requirements remain fully intact. However, he advised that the Proposer should submit on EPADS V2.0 a formal query in this regard, following which the matter would be examined in detail to assess whether any relaxation in the Synchronous Generator efficiency requirement could be considered. |
|
5. |
The Representative of Proposer M/s CDigital, while referring to Section-III (Evaluation and Qualification Criteria) of Volume-I of the RFP/EPC Bidding Document for Package-III, particularly Experience Clauses 4.2(a), Clause 4.2(b), and Clause 4.2(c), inquired whether, in the absence of relevant experience of the main equipment manufacturer in similar 45 MW or 54 MW Hydropower Projects, the manufacturer could be engaged as a Sub-Contractor without forming a Joint Venture, while the representative of Proposer M/s CDigital participates as the Lead Partner of the Proposer in order to meet the Qualification requirements as a single member of the Proposer. |
The Project Manager, AHMC, addressed the query and responded that this matter has been adequately incorporated in Section-III Evaluation and Qualification Criteria 4.2(a), Volume-I of the RFP/EPC Bidding Document of Package-III, wherein provisions have been made for the engagement of Specialized Sub-Contractor. He clarified that the Proposers may utilize the services of Specialized Sub-Contractor, for design, execution and manufacturing works, subject to compliance with the conditions stipulated in the Evaluation and Qualification Criteria, Volume-I of RFP/EPC Bidding Document of Package-III. |
|
6. |
The Representative of Proposer M/s CDigital sought Clarification regarding the mode of submission of Proposals, specifically whether the Proposals are required to be submitted in hard copy (physical form) or uploaded through the EPADS v2.0 system only. Furthermore, the representative of the Proposer highlighted concerns regarding file size limitations on the EPADS/PPRA portal during the upload process and sought guidance in this regard. |
The Project Director, ALHPP WAPDA, addressed the query by clarifying that submission of Proposals through EPADS v2.0 is mandatory for all Proposers, and no alternative mode of submission shall be accepted. Submission of hard copies for proposals in addition to proposals uploading on EPADsv2.0 (Mandatory) is being taken-up with concerned WAPDA formations (CCC/ C&M) for guidance. The General Manager (Projects) Northern Areas, WAPDA, added to the discussion that the Proposals uploaded on EPADS v2.0 shall be treated as final for evaluation purposes, even in cases where physical documents are also submitted. He further stated that any Pre-Proposal Clarifications pertaining to the uploaded RFP/EPC Bidding Document will be formally communicated to the ALHPP Project Office, WAPDA through the EPADS v2.0 portal. |
|
7. |
The representative of Proposer M/s GRC requested an extension of one month in the Proposal Submission Deadline from May 14, 2026 to June 14, 2026, citing that the Procurement process involves Foreign JV Firm participation and coordination across multiple countries for the manufacturer of Electro-Mechanical Equipment. The Representative of Proposer M/s GRC further requested relaxation of PEC Provisional Licensing requirements for Foreign JV Firms, stating that PEC registration for Provisional Licensing of Foreign JV Firms is a time-consuming process and may adversely impact the participation of foreign JV Partners in the bidding procedure. |
The Project Manager, AHMC, responded that the requirements regarding PEC Provisional Licensing for all Foreign JV Firms have already been addressed in Section-III, Evaluation & Qualification Criteria, Volume-I of the RFP/EPC Bidding Document for Package-III, wherein Foreign JV Firms may participate in the bidding process through association with the Lead Partner of Proposer as a Specialized Sub-Contractor on which PEC Provisional Licensing is not applicable to participate in the bidding procedure. The Project Director, ALHPP WAPDA, further clarified that PEC Provisional Licensing registration is mandatory for all Foreign JV Firms participating in bidding process in accordance with the bye-laws of the PEC Governing Authority in Pakistan. He reiterated the provision for inclusion of Foreign Firms as a Specialized Sub-Contractor with the lead partner of the Proposer. The Project Manager, AHMC, further advised that a formal request for extension of the Proposal Submission Date by one month should be submitted through PPRA EPADS V2.0 for proper consideration, and the matter will be reviewed accordingly. |
|
|
Upon discussion regarding the Proposal Submission timeline, the representative of Proposer M/s Shaheen & Sons requested an extension of 8–10 weeks in Proposal submission. Subsequently, all the representatives of Proposers present in the meeting collectively requested the Employer to extend the Proposal Submission Deadline for at least one month for Package-III. |
The Project Director ALHPP WAPDA stated that further extension of 6-8 weeks in Proposal Submission Deadline is excessive, as the NIT and RFP/EPC Bidding Document had already been uploaded on PPRA EPADS V2.0 on March 16, 2026, and two moths tie for the Proposal Submission has already been initially provided, i.e., up to May 14, 2026. He further added that Package-I is already at an advance stage of Contract award and requires synchronization with the Package-III EPC Contractor; therefore, any further delay may lead to contractual and implementation complications. However, the Project Director ALHPP WAPDA advised that the Proposers may submit their requests formally on PPRA EPADS V2.0, so that the matter can be examined and considered for appropriate extension of time. |
|
|
The representative of Proposer M/s Multiline sought clarification regarding ITB 16.1 of Section-II (Proposal Data Sheet) of Volume-I of the RFP/EPC Bidding Document for Package-III, wherein the proposed price currency has been indicated as PKR with allowance of up to 80% foreign currency. The Representative of Proposer M/s Multiline noted that Section-IV (Proposal Forms) of the same document permits pricing in three currencies, and requested clarification to resolve this inconsistency in the same document. |
The AHMC Expert, Contracts clarified that the provision contained in Section-II (Proposal Data Sheet) of Volume-I of the RFP/EPC Bidding Document for Package-III, allowing pricing in one foreign currency, shall prevail. He further stated that the inconsistency in the document is a typographical error, which will be rectified through an Addendum to the RFP/EPC Bidding Document of Package-III. |
|
|
The Representative of Proposer M/s Multiline sought clarification regarding Sub-Clause 14.2 (Advance Payment) under Section-VIII, Part-B, Special Provisions of Part-II Particular Conditions of Contract of Volume-I of the RFP/EPC Bidding Document for Package-III. It was noted that three modes for Advance Payment Guarantee has been specified, namely: (a) Scheduled Bank in Pakistan, (b) Foreign Bank duly counter-guaranteed by a Scheduled Bank in Pakistan, and (c) Insurance Entity rated “A” by PACRA/VIS. The Representative of Proposer M/s Multiline inquired whether the Advance Payment Guarantee may also be submitted in the form of an Advance Insurance Guarantee. |
The Deputy Director Central Contracts Cell (CCC), WAPDA clarified that Employer does not accept Insurance Guarantees for the Advance Payment purpose, and the requirement pertains specifically to Bank Guarantees. It was further explained that WAPDA’s preference is for Bank Guarantees required from Contractor for Advance Payment release; however, certain flexibility has been provided in terms of issuing Banks, including those with defined high credit ratings. The Project Director ALHPP WAPDA further advised that in case the Proposer identifies any ambiguity or typographical errors in the document, a formal written query should be submitted from the Proposer on PPRA EPADS V2.0 so that the matter may be revised and, if required, addressed through an Addendum to the RFP/EPC Bidding Document of Package-III. |
|
|
The Representative of Proposer M/s Umer Jan & Co. sought clarification regarding Payment Terms, Sub-Clause 14.4 of Section-VIII, Part-B Special Provisions under Part-II Particular Conditions of Contract of Volume-I of the RFP/EPC Bidding Document for Package-III. It was noted that 2.5% of each of the four Schedules of Payment Terms Supply of Plant from Abroad, Supply of Plant within the Employer’s Country, Design Services, and Installation & Other Services has been indicated as a retention linked to the Performance Security A, to be withheld until issuance of the Taking Over Certificate (TOC). The Representative of Proposer M/s Umer Jan further observed that in addition to yje 10% of the retention of the four Payment Schedules, 10% is to be retained as Performance Security and an additional 5% as Retention Money, resulting in a cumulative perceived deduction of 25%, which is considered too high for a EPC Contractor to maintain his financial circle. The Representative of Proposer M/s Umer Jan requested reconsideration and relaxation of the retention structure, noting that under typical EPC Contract mode arrangements, no such retention is applied and full payment shall be made upon completion of Design Services. |
The Deputy Director Central Contracts Cell (CCC), WAPDA clarified the Proposer’s misunderstanding and stated that the total retention under Sub-Clause 14.4 of Section-VIII, Part-B Special Provisions under Part-II Particular Conditions of Contract of Volume-I of the RFP/EPC Bidding Document is only 2.5% instead of 10% of the Proposal Price, which is to be released upon issuance of the Taking Over Certificate (TOC). It was further clarified that the Retention Money is 5%, while Performance Security is 10%, thereby bringing the total Financial securities/retentions to 17.5% rather than the 25% figure interpreted by the Proposer. It was also added that 50% of the Performance Security will be released upon expiry of the Defects Notification Period (DNP), in accordance with the Contract provisions. The Project Director ALHPP WAPDA stated that regarding the retention related to Schedule No. 03 (Design Services), a formal query should be submitted to the Employer through PPRA EPADS V2.0 for detailed review and appropriate clarification, if required, addressed through an Addendum to the RFP/EPC Bidding Document of Package-III. |
The meeting was concluded by the General Manager (Projects) Northern Areas, WAPDA, who requested all the representatives of Proposers to submit any remaining Pre-Proposal Clarifications and queries pertaining to the RFP/EPC Bidding Document of Package-III at the earliest through PPRA EPADS V2.0, preferably at least 14 days prior to the Proposal Submission Date of May 14, 2026, in accordance with the provisions stipulated in the RFP/EPC Bidding Document for Package-III. He also emphasized the participants to formally inform the Project Director ALHPP, WAPDA for their site visit prior to Proposal Submission so that joint visit can be arranged for better understanding of the Project.
Online Participant of Employer (WAPDA)
1. General Manager (Projects) Northern Areas, WAPDA Mr. Waseem Ali Mullah
Physical Participants of Employer (WAPDA)
2. Chief Engineer / Project Director ALHPP, WAPDA Mr. Iqtidar Hussain
3. Executive Engineer (Electrical) ALHPP, WAPDA Mr. Tahir Sarwar
4. Deputy Director Hydel (Dev), WAPDA Mr. Wajahat Barig
5. Deputy Director Hydel (Dev), WAPDA Mr. Soban Masood
6. Deputy Director (Mech) CCC, WAPDA Mr. Ansar Waseem
7. Assistant Director (Environment) ALHPP, WAPDA Mr. Muhammad Irfan
8. Assistant Manager (Insurance), WAPDA Mr. Irfan Jahangir
Physical Participants of Management Consultants (AHMC)
9. Project Manager, AHMC Mr. Waqar Hasnain
10. Expert Contracts, AHMC Mr. Altaf Hussain Bhatti
11. Senior Engineer (Electrical), AHMC Mr. Nauman Javed Khan
12. Senior Engineer (Switchyard), AHMC Mr. Muhammad Saleem
13. Senior Engineer (Electrical), AHMC Mr. Abdul Waheed
14. Junior Engineer, AHMC Mr. Salar Ayub
15. Junior Engineer, AHMC Mr. Qaseem Haider
16. Junior Engineer, AHMC Mr. Shahryar
Online Participants (AHMC)
17. Expert Mechanical, AHMC Mr. Ali Khurram
Physical Participants of Potential Proposers
Representatives from different firms:
1. M/s Zahir Khan & Brothers (Pvt) Ltd.
2. M/s Ghulam Rasool & Company (Pvt) Ltd.
3. M/s Umer Jan & Co. (Pvt) Ltd.
4. M/s CDigital (Pvt) Ltd.
5. M/s Multiline Enterprises (Pvt) Ltd.
6. M/s Shaheen & Sons (Pvt) Ltd.
7. M/s TFC Lahore (Pvt) Ltd.
Online Participants Proposers
Representatives from different firms:
8. M/s Al-Fajr International (Pvt) Ltd.
9. M/s CRBC Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd.
Date and Time April 14, 2026 at 1100 hours
Venue WAPDA Committee Room, WAPDA House, Lahore
| # | Corrigendum Number | Corrigendum Date | Old Document | New Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CORR-P13301-008 | Wednesday, August 19, 2026 04:09 PM | View PDF | View PDF |
| 2 | CORR-P13301-007 | Monday, August 10, 2026 02:04 AM | View PDF | View PDF |
| 3 | CORR-P13301-006 | Monday, August 3, 2026 10:29 AM | View PDF | View PDF |
| 4 | CORR-P13301-005 | Sunday, June 14, 2026 01:02 AM | View PDF | View PDF |
| 5 | CORR-P13301-004 | Monday, May 25, 2026 11:30 AM | View PDF | View PDF |
| 6 | CORR-P13301-003 | Thursday, May 21, 2026 09:41 AM | View PDF | View PDF |
| 7 | CORR-P13301-002 | Tuesday, May 12, 2026 10:45 AM | View PDF | View PDF |
| 8 | CORR-P13301-001 | Tuesday, April 14, 2026 01:46 PM | View PDF | View PDF |
⏳ Time Left for Bid Submission Deadline